If you don’t see how things are going, how we are being filtered more and more into a Brave New World, then read this and start your brain a-thinking.
“Today instead of the Rockefeller Foundation funding eugenics programs with have the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation funding inBloom, a database that can be used to capture information on potential test subjects. We have Pearson conducting field tests on millions of children without their parents’ permission or knowledge. We have Michael and Susan Dell running a rival database called Ed-Fi that operates identically now, to the way inBloom is trying to operate in the future. We have the Walton family, heirs to the Wal-Mart fortunes, funding a pared down pauper’s education to the masses, so they are easier to control and convert into future Wal-Mart employees and customers. The Koch brothers have influence over PBS (the Public Broadcasting System) which in theory is a media watchdog that only theoretically keeps watch over our liberties and infringement upon the same. All other media sources are beholden and censored by corporate and government interests, save independent bloggers who are now under siege by these government and corporate interests seeking to silence us so you only get a single “sponsored” narrative.”
Believe it or not, these concepts and words are all related. inBloom and Ed-Fi are two vendors that use cloud computer to store massive quantities of student data (the Louisiana is currently doing business with.) The information these vendors plan on storing will be used to classify, sort and allocate children by their skills and early proficiencies, much as they do in Communist China. It’s no coincidence that many education reformers point to China as an example of education success and something to emulated, not shunned despite what many Chinese themselves think. Eugenicists advocated the conscious elimination of “inferior” human being from the gene pool and promotion of the superior specimens. Eugenics is generally considered a discredited and bankrupt philosophy and social movement, pioneered by a cousin of Charles Darwin – seeking to apply his relative’s research in what he considered a productive manner, but which most of us would…
View original post 2,415 more words
“Every parent, student, and teacher in the country is concerned about the influence of corporate vendors on education policy. What is represented as an extreme movement by our Education Secretary can be more accurately described as a consumer revolt against shoddy products produced by an education vendor biopoly (Pearson and McGraw Hill). Because these two vendors have redefined the education marketplace to meet the requirements of RTTT, they both need to be required to write competitive impact statements for the Anti-Trust Division of the Department of Justice.”
Gates and Murdoch like to say their interest in education is because their big hearts mean they really must help the poor wee kiddies learn better.
Funny how they weren’t so interested until profit could be made, but hey, I’m just a bit cynical these days.
And it’s no wonder I am when you learn about things like this…
Gates and Murdoch have managed to wangle access to a huge field of very personal and incredibly detailed data from whole US school districts for every single child.
Crimminy, that’s a whole lot of information they have about these kids.
Would you be happy to know the school district was handing over information about your child to a private company?
Name, address, all qualifications, how, where and when you were educated and by whom. Yes, your teachers, teacher aides, home tutor, teacher assistant, family member that taught you, all listed.
Attendance? Yes, all logged, including the category of ‘tardy’. This is from first grade, as if a child that age is in charge of what time they reach school.
Had some trouble in school? Whether it’s a violation or a breach of the school’s code of conduct, it’s there, including close detail about where it occurred. Also a detailed record of any weapon type. That’s just plain spooky. Why does a private company need to know that? The police and the school, yes. Parents and carers, yes. inBloom? Not so much.
Your child has a disability? Excellent, we’ll have that information too, thank you very much, and here are the inBloom categories:
You want to opt out? You want to keep your information private? Tough bananas. As one parent said:
“I have emailed and called [State Commissioner] John King’s office over 40 times the past month refusing to consent to allow the DOE to transfer my children’s personal information into inBloom to be bought and sold around the world…” He was told there was no option to opt out. None. Your data, but not your choice.
Another concern is that the data is held in the cloud and its security cannot be guaranteed, but there’s nothing these parents can do about that, either.
It seems that the data is not yours even when it about you or your child.
Your child has been filed, stamped and indexed. Your child is a number.
So, why would a private company be mining this data?
This is not the education system or health system or even the police collecting all of this information. This is a business.
Just think about that for a minute.
They have your address, your email, sex, language, everything.
Great for targeted marketing, don’t you reckon. Students are such great potential consumers.
As Diane Ravitch said “If anyone thinks for one New York minute that the purpose of creating this database is simply for the good of teachers and students then that person is credulous in the extreme.”
What about Aotearoa?
Well, from this year all Kiwi kids will have a National Student Number from the day they enter into education, and students cannot be opted out.
The Ministry of Education’s website says that “The National Student Number (NSN) is a unique identifier that can be used by authorised users for the following approved purposes:
It goes on to say that all other uses are prohibited, as if that should make us feel safe. But since Gates and Murdoch use their systems as a way to collect student statistics and do (dodgy?) research, that’s hardly reassuring, is it?
The web site also tells us that the NSN “facilitates the collection and management of core identity information about a student in a central location” and that “[a]dditional authorised users can be added by regulation”.
So here’s the big question: Are we being lined up for a bit of Gates’ and Murdoch’s data mining jiggery pokery, too?
One to keep a very close eye on,