you're reading...
Education, GERM (Global Education Reform Movement), National Standards, New Zealand, NZEI

Another pointless and costly National Standards exercise

national standardsThe publication of unreliable National Standards data by region today is an expensive distraction that risks creating an unhealthy competition between regions but will do nothing to help lift the educational achievement of students.

NZEI Immediate Past President Ian Leckie is questioning why the Government is releasing such poor quality and unreliable data.

“It appears the Government is trying to create some kind of regional competition around students’ results, but it’s particularly pointless because there is no mechanism for addressing student achievement or school effectiveness at a regional government level.”

Mr Leckie says the Government’s ongoing obsession with shonky National Standards has been an extremely frustrating exercise for teachers.

“More than $40 million of public money is being wasted on producing National Standards data. But teachers and schools already know which students are under-achieving. The big problem is a lack of funding to share effective teaching strategies and provide specialist support so that every child gets the education they need.”

He says the regional break-down shows variation between regions that are within the margin of error in most cases. 

“Even if the data is to be believed, all it tells us is that in regions with the highest rates of child poverty, student achievement is lower.  This tells us nothing new.”

Mr Leckie says while the regional data is uninformative and meaningless, he fears that the impending publication of school-by-school data will be very damaging.

“The publication of detailed school data by children at every year level later this month will unfairly label some schools as failing  – and risks identifying and labelling children as “failing” when they are making normal progress for their age.  

“The Minister’s own advice is that the Standards, which were never trialled or tested, need to be reviewed and adjusted. We advise parents not to place any importance on this information but to talk to their children’s teacher if they want a true picture of their child’s progress and success at school.”

About Save Our Schools NZ

"One needs to be slow to form convictions, but once formed they must be defended against the heaviest odds." Gandhi


One thought on “Another pointless and costly National Standards exercise

  1. Last year when the newspapers released the data there was one particular school with one student below standard in something. (The school had a special report done on it in the paper). Now I know a few parents from that school and I can probably guess which child that is. Am I right, probably 75% sure. Is that fair to the kid involved that people are able to guess who is the kid who ruined the school’s attempt at a perfect record? Is it fair that I could also be guessing wrongly? It’s not likely I’ll come in contact with the kid so I’m not likely to do any damage but what about the parents who are?

    I tried to get the privacy commissio on to the problem of children identifiability but they just didn’t get it. It’s going to be really bad if they go down to year level by school, or even worse, ethnicity by year level by school.


    Posted by mpledger | July 19, 2013, 10:38 am

Share your thoughts:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow Save Our Schools NZ on

Category list:


%d bloggers like this: